Demolition Drama at 143 Ludlow Street

Posted on: August 10th, 2012 at 6:09 am by and

Imagine that every night before going to bed, your apartment was sealed from the outside with plastic nailed to the door? While it sounds like a scene straight out of ET, this is routine for residents of 143 Ludlow Street.

THE PURCHASE

143 Ludlow Street was recently purchased by Samy Mahfar’s SMA Equities. Mahfar also recently acquired four vacant Lower East Side parcels on East Houston near Attorney Street. Documents filed with the city reveal that a special LLC was set up (143 Ludlow SM LLC) for the $5.2 million transaction. That sale officially hit the books just a couple weeks ago. The more controversial part of the news, however, is the action taken after closing. The new owner proceeded to, according to a neighbor,  aggressively demolish five apartments inside the mid-block tenement, and residents are alleging the illegalities of this work.

Apt #18

THE HUMAN CONDITION

From the moment gutting began at 143 Ludlow Street, “Priority A” emergency complaints appeared in the DOB database. The combination of dangerous living conditions and stability of the apartments have left the handful of remaining tenants inside the building rather worried. The situation escalated last week when firefighters were called to the scene after a gas pipe was jarred loose, and the scent permeated the upper floors. We happened to be ambling past the building around that time and contractors were still busy unloading bales of debris into a specialty garbage truck.

Meanwhile, for almost a week, holes in the stairway walls were exposed, leaving voids that easily cleared six stories. The issue wasn’t remedied immediately, but was eventually patched. In addition, apartment #18 lost a load-bearing wall which hasn’t been replaced, and #17 was boarded up and declared structurally unsound after a 2005 fire. The fire wall between the units was breached, and the scorched scars are still visible seven years later.

Apt. #17, fire-damaged truss without scaffolding

THE GOVERNMENT

Equally troubling to the living conditions is the enforcement of proper safety procedure…or seemingly lack thereof. The DOB maintains that all work is currently in compliance with approved plans and permits, however a source familiar with the situation disagrees. The source, who wishes to remain anonymous, reveals that building inspectors arrive on scene frequently, yet fail to cease demolition despite “20+ likely causes for a stop-work order.” What’s more, several of these inspectors (badges #2442, #2335, and #0338) allegedly close out caller complaints remotely and without a proper site visit. As a result, DOB is currently amidst an internal investigation. Something’s definitely fishy here.

When reached for comment, the DOB press department stressed that the building has already been inspected more than ten times, and all was found “in compliance with approved plans and permits.” With regard to remote complaint resolutions, the DOB chalks that up to the appearance of duplicate complaints in the system. While entirely plausible that multiple complaints are being made for similar issues, the fact remains that residents are living in dangerous conditions and yet the construction continues.

Is this building the next to fall victim to the age-old ploy by new owners to kick out long-time tenants for upscaling? From a distance, it seems very likely and we’ll continue to follow this story and report as new details emerge.

Recent Stories

Photo: Dennis Archer
The Decades-Old Broome Street Firehouse is Now a Pile of Rubble

It’s a theme repeated ad nauseum on this site. An historic structure on the Lower East Side reduced to rubble. Such is the case (again) with 185 Broome Street, the old firehouse building that dated (note, past tense) back to the 1930s. The tidal wave of Essex Crossing is crashing … and crushing. It only […]

The Bowery near Prince St.
20 Photos from the (Very Different) Lower East Side of the 1980s [PHOTOS]

Thirty-year Lower East Side resident Steve Butcher recently emailed us to share a trove of archival images of the “good old bad days.” The 88-shot collection – dating back to the early eighties and nineties – further illustrates a neighborhood almost unrecognizable (nay, unfathomable) to today’s residents. We see the context and character that preceded […]

cafe colonial goodbye
It’s Been 5 Years Since Cafe Colonial Shuttered

It was exactly five years ago that Cafe Colonial concluded its run at 73 East Houston Street. The longtime favorite – here at the corner of Mulberry for fifteen years – shuttered back on May 25, 2010 thanks to tripled rent. And what could afford that but flashy boutique chain Rag & Bone? Rag & […]

Photo: Gilf's Instagram
Street Artist GILF Notes the “Gentrification in Progress” at 190 Bowery

Street artist GILF returned to the Lower East Side in the overnight hours to provide some illicit commentary to the iconic Germania Bank Building at 190 Bowery. For a brief period, the staircase was condoned off with her token “Gentrification in Progress” tape. Her goal with the exhibition is a discussion of the “rising rent […]

102 Norfolk St., July 2014
DOH Implements New Lead Dust Procedures in Response to Mahfar Tenant Harassment

Those following the saga of Samy Mahfar (aka SMA Equities) know that the controversial landlord subjected tenants to hazardous lead levels in at least two of his many Lower East Side Holdings. For instance, tests conducted by the Department of Health concluded that 102 Norfolk Street boasted 2,900 times the legal limit. The scary exposure became […]

  • Jay

    Now they are filing and being approved for demolition permits on apartments that are currently occupied.

  • Bobby

    My girlfriend lives in the building so I spent quite a lot of time there. I’m qualified to say this article is not accurate. The landlord has fully complied with the DOB and has permits for all the work that is being done. I actually met the landlord outside the building and hes a very decent man. This article is fabricated and false.

    Jay, that is impossible. Get your facts straight. ^

    • Jay

      Yes you are full of baloney – we know everyone in the building and no one’s significant other would take the new landlord’s side on anything. They would prefer we all move out in body bags.

    • James

      Your “girlfriend” is one of the five elderly tenants left? Why would the landlord speak with anyone who is not the tenant of record. Fail on credibility “Bobby.”

  • Mitch

    So this boils down to either A)This article is trying to claim that the DOB’s integrity is compromised in this issue and that the new Landlord is bribing them in order to conduct illegal and dangerous improvements OR B) The neighborhood/tenants are not happy that their building will be updated at the cost of some LEGAL inconveniences and increased rents (which are more reflective of the market in Manhattan and will be a result of the improved property)

    • Iry

      C. The building is not being updated for current tenants. The only apartments under renovation are vacant apartments updated to achieve destabilization. Homelessness is not a legal inconvenience unless you are rich.

      • Mitch

        Homelessness is a legal inconvenience if you’re living in an area you can’t afford to live in…. You can’t fight market forces if you live in a capitalistic system. Sounds to me like you think it’s right that people live somewhere while paying 75% less than their neighbors….