Rumor: SoHo House Might Open at 139-141 Ludlow

Posted on: January 18th, 2013 at 6:19 am by

139-ludlow-doors

Rumors swirling the last few weeks about SoHo House taking over 139 Ludlow Street gained some serious legitimacy yesterday. Gothamist reports that top brass of the swanky private club is currently “in talks” to open a location at the onetime funeral parlor. However, ongoing building renovations would push any possible launch into next year. There’s certainly been an uptick in activity on premise of late…

139-ludlow-demolition

This latest news notwithstanding, we’ve also heard plenty of talk to the contrary, that 139-141 Ludlow will instead become high-end condos. Either way, some sort of upscale item is coming to this amazing piece of architecture.

Recent Stories

Those Iconic Village Voice News Boxes Disappeared from the Streets

The Village Voice news boxes have seemingly disappeared from the city streets. So swift was the apparent removal, you may not have even noticed. The disappearance comes roughly two months after the weekly publication announced that its print edition would cease to exist. Indeed, the final physical issue ran on September 20, with Bob Dylan […]

‘RISE Coffee’ Unveils New Takeout Window at Dudley’s on Orchard Street

Nearly two years after its streetside debut beside the A. Turen boutique, RISE Coffee is expanding. The company just colonized a new takeout window south of the Delancey Divide. RISE Coffee, particularly the nitro cold brew, is now available from the window of Dudley’s Deli at 85 Orchard Street. Twin boards now flank the spot, […]

La Caverna on Rivington Street Proposes Expansion into 3-Level Nightclub

La Caverna on Rivington Street is eyeing an expansion on Rivington Street that would create a multilevel compound. The large office space at 124 Rivington Street – operational headquarters for the Bluecore e-commerce business since April 2015 – has been up for grabs for more than a year. For much of that time, the landlord […]

Revived ‘Lam Zhou’ Dumpling Mecca Opens on the Bowery

Chinatown dumpling darling Lam Zhou reopened this past Wednesday, returning to the ranks of the living with a much larger footprint. New headquarters is now at 40 Bowery, with a sign proclaiming that menu and ownership remains the same. The upgrade still preserves that no-frills setup, yet on a grander scale. Its long and narrow […]

10-Story ODA Condos Amidst Ascent on Chrystie Street

Ten stories of additional upper-crust glitz is on its way for the Chrystie Street midsection… Indeed, the ODA-designed condo at 165 Chrystie Street started its ascent last month, and is progressing upward quite quickly. As of now, the structure is sitting at over six stories. This sudden burst in activity follows more than a year […]

  • LOVELYLES

    Why would Susan stetzer approve this and not approve a latin bistro around the corner? Where are the so called dwellers that care so much of this neighborhoods quality of life? Makes me wonder is this racial?

    • swag

      Neighbors are tracking the activity at 139 Ludlow. I believe a quick explanation on the procedure of community review will answer your questions.

      Business owners initiate liquor license applications through the community board, which no one has done. Concluding from this report, a liquor license request won’t appear for a while here, if at all. Community boards do not vote on rumors and a district manager can’t implement anything without a vote.

      You ask whether it is racial(ly motivated?) to “approve” a non-existent liquor license application around the corner from an application currently under review by NY State that was denied by the community board. (To review: no application = no board vote = no approval or disapproval.)

      • LOVELYLES

        @34d66e6bc19ad70db5586e1192040432:disqus remember those words,(a liquor license request won’t appear for a while here, if at all) Well see in a couple of months, it won’t be rumors. Oh an about that license being denied by the community, check the minutes on that application see who had more in favor then oppose. I believe a quick explanation on the procedure of community review will answer your claims. LOL!