This Testimony Scolding Mahfar’s Re-Zoning Proposal for East Houston is Everything

Posted on: August 10th, 2016 at 5:00 am by
This image has been archived or removed.

Samy Mahfar is pushing hard for rezoning a portion of East Houston to placate personal gain. The proposed two-and-a-half block commercial overlay is seemingly a play to ensure bars or restaurants are permitted in his forthcoming luxury development at 255 East Houston (aka 171 Suffolk). As opposed to community services, like the day care centers he displaced.

Nothing new, really. Mahfar’s associates twice pitched Community Board 3, resulting in denial both times, first in 2011 then again this past March. Nevertheless, the city is proceeding in favor of Mahfar, despite protestations from the community, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, and Councilwoman Rosie Mendez. The controversial rezoning plan was recently approved by the City Planning Commission, which is controlled by the Mayor.

This image has been archived or removed.

Rendering of 255 East Houston

City Council held a public hearing yesterday. This strongly-worded testimony from Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation says it all, perfectly encapsulating the relationship between developers and City Hall.

Good morning Councilmembers. I am here today to urge you to vote no on the proposed rezoning of East Houston Street, which was approved by the City Planning Commission over the objections of Community Board #3 and the Manhattan Borough President.

There is absolutely no benefit to the public in the proposed rezoning. That is supposed to be the criteria for adopting zoning changes. Helping a single developer who has hired a well-connected lobbying firm that is a strong fundraiser for and supporter of the Mayor, as is the case here, is not supposed to be the criteria for doing so. But it appears to be here.

It is inconceivable that an applicant with such a checkered history would be so readily accommodated by the City Planning Commission as was done in this case. This developer has a long record of accusations of tenant harassment. The city subsidized daycare center which previously occupied the space he is seeking to develop was forced out, at least in part according to the Community Board, by failures on the part of this applicant to ensure the safety and integrity of the building. When this area was rezoned in 2008, the Community Board specifically sought to keep a commercial overlay from these blocks in order to encourage the retention of community facility uses here. And yet the City Planning Commission and the Mayor are only too willing to accommodate a developer whose actions have had such a harmful impact upon low-income tenants, as well as neighborhood residents who need access to affordable childcare.

This is a particular slap in the face given that at the same time, elsewhere in Community Board 3 and in Council District 2, the Mayor and City Planning Commission have adamantly refused to act upon community-requested rezoning plans that are supported by the local community board and Councilmember.

On the west side of Councilmember Mendez’s district, along the University Place and Broadway corridors, we have been begging the City Planning Commission for nearly two years to move ahead with a community-driven rezoning that would for the first time require affordable housing in the area, and put in place reasonable height caps for new development. But in spite of the support of Councilmember Mendez, Borough President Brewer, the local community board, and virtually the entire affected community, the Mayor and the City Planning Commission have refused.

And in Chinatown, a community-driven rezoning plan that would similarly preserve and create affordable housing, protect tenants, and keep new development in character with the neighborhood has been consistently rejected by the Mayor and the Commission, in spite of similar local support. And yet this developer’s requested rezoning, which will benefit no one but him, receives strong support from the Mayor’s City Planning Commission. Something is very, very wrong.

This is not the kind of rezoning this community is looking for or needs. If the Mayor and City Planning Commission wants to facilitate rezonings that will serve the public interest and which the affected communities want, there are several in this same Council District and Community Board to choose from. We urge you not to approve this one.

Vote happens next week. Get ready for Rivington House redux…

Click here to voice your opposition.

Recent Stories

Game Over for ‘Water World Amusements’ Arcade on Essex Street

Much like the movie of same, Water World Amusements unceremoniously sunk. The arcade, which opened just over a year ago at 35 Essex Street, is no more. Gaming cabinets remain locked in the dark retail space, while leasing signage dominates the store marquee. That this game room failed to hit is not a shock. Water […]

‘Greens and Grains’ Shutters, While Famous Hakki Readies Essex Chicken Spot

Greens and Grains is no more after a year in business, as Hell Square eats another of its own. Instead, the so-called Pizza Champion is opening a chicken-focused eatery. Hakki Akdeniz, who owns a plethora of pizzerias around the neighborhood, is planning to open Essex Chicken at 115 Essex Street. Just a few doors down […]

La Pecora Bianca to Open Another Outpost at Former Delicatessen Space on Prince Street

Delicatessen shuttered suddenly last month after eleven years in Little Italy. However, its demise is actually months in the making, and with a big-name takeover on the way, to boot. The 2,000 square-foot corner space at 265 Lafayette (aka 54 Prince) is to become the third Manhattan outpost of La Pecora Bianca. And renovations are […]

Zara Looks to Legalize its Oversized SoHo Flagship Store

The flagship Zara store on Broadway is hoping to legalize its SoHo footprint by altering the current zoning. Zara, which purchased the commercial condo at 503 Broadway in 2015 for $284 million, occupies a much larger footprint than what is permitted under the current zoning. (Former location of Old Navy from 1998 to 2015.) Once […]

Does this East Broadway Traffic Pattern Change Alleviate Bridge Congestion?

As part of the effort to address the logjam to the Williamsburg Bridge, there was a previous update to the traffic pattern near the Lower East Side on-ramp. Motorists can no longer turn onto Clinton Street from East Broadway during nighttime hours. New signs have been in place beside the signals. But has this simple […]