This Testimony Scolding Mahfar’s Re-Zoning Proposal for East Houston is Everything

Posted on: August 10th, 2016 at 5:00 am by
This image has been archived or removed.

Samy Mahfar is pushing hard for rezoning a portion of East Houston to placate personal gain. The proposed two-and-a-half block commercial overlay is seemingly a play to ensure bars or restaurants are permitted in his forthcoming luxury development at 255 East Houston (aka 171 Suffolk). As opposed to community services, like the day care centers he displaced.

Nothing new, really. Mahfar’s associates twice pitched Community Board 3, resulting in denial both times, first in 2011 then again this past March. Nevertheless, the city is proceeding in favor of Mahfar, despite protestations from the community, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer, and Councilwoman Rosie Mendez. The controversial rezoning plan was recently approved by the City Planning Commission, which is controlled by the Mayor.

This image has been archived or removed.

Rendering of 255 East Houston

City Council held a public hearing yesterday. This strongly-worded testimony from Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation says it all, perfectly encapsulating the relationship between developers and City Hall.

Good morning Councilmembers. I am here today to urge you to vote no on the proposed rezoning of East Houston Street, which was approved by the City Planning Commission over the objections of Community Board #3 and the Manhattan Borough President.

There is absolutely no benefit to the public in the proposed rezoning. That is supposed to be the criteria for adopting zoning changes. Helping a single developer who has hired a well-connected lobbying firm that is a strong fundraiser for and supporter of the Mayor, as is the case here, is not supposed to be the criteria for doing so. But it appears to be here.

It is inconceivable that an applicant with such a checkered history would be so readily accommodated by the City Planning Commission as was done in this case. This developer has a long record of accusations of tenant harassment. The city subsidized daycare center which previously occupied the space he is seeking to develop was forced out, at least in part according to the Community Board, by failures on the part of this applicant to ensure the safety and integrity of the building. When this area was rezoned in 2008, the Community Board specifically sought to keep a commercial overlay from these blocks in order to encourage the retention of community facility uses here. And yet the City Planning Commission and the Mayor are only too willing to accommodate a developer whose actions have had such a harmful impact upon low-income tenants, as well as neighborhood residents who need access to affordable childcare.

This is a particular slap in the face given that at the same time, elsewhere in Community Board 3 and in Council District 2, the Mayor and City Planning Commission have adamantly refused to act upon community-requested rezoning plans that are supported by the local community board and Councilmember.

On the west side of Councilmember Mendez’s district, along the University Place and Broadway corridors, we have been begging the City Planning Commission for nearly two years to move ahead with a community-driven rezoning that would for the first time require affordable housing in the area, and put in place reasonable height caps for new development. But in spite of the support of Councilmember Mendez, Borough President Brewer, the local community board, and virtually the entire affected community, the Mayor and the City Planning Commission have refused.

And in Chinatown, a community-driven rezoning plan that would similarly preserve and create affordable housing, protect tenants, and keep new development in character with the neighborhood has been consistently rejected by the Mayor and the Commission, in spite of similar local support. And yet this developer’s requested rezoning, which will benefit no one but him, receives strong support from the Mayor’s City Planning Commission. Something is very, very wrong.

This is not the kind of rezoning this community is looking for or needs. If the Mayor and City Planning Commission wants to facilitate rezonings that will serve the public interest and which the affected communities want, there are several in this same Council District and Community Board to choose from. We urge you not to approve this one.

Vote happens next week. Get ready for Rivington House redux…

Click here to voice your opposition.

Recent Stories

East Broadway Subway Station Turns 85

The East Broadway subway station wasn’t always a shady dungeon attracting crime. Once upon a time, the transit stop inspired celebrations across the Lower East Side. It was exactly eighty-five years ago – January 1, 1936 – that the East Broadway subway station debuted to the public. The feat of subterranean engineering, then known as […]

Looking at the New Ludlow House Annex Atop Demolished Libation Site

Well, that was quick. With Libation excised from the Lower East Side, the hole is now filled. Taken over by Ludlow House. The building at 137 Ludlow Street was demolished last year, and replaced in a matter of months. In fact, it’s already operational. The architecture of this one-story newcomer mirrors design elements of its […]

Stringer Promises ‘Fair Share’ of PPP for City Businesses

City Comptroller (and mayoral candidate) Scott Stringer held a press conference yesterday at the Chinatown kiosk on Canal Street, announcing a plan to funnel federal Payroll Protection (PPP) dollars to New York city businesses. It certainly triggered an uncomfortable memory of last year’s PPP fiasco. The first round of PPP went into effect just a […]

‘Open Streets’ Town Hall Yields More Questions than Answers

Tuesday night’s Town Hall on Open Restaurants and Open Streets, hosted by Community Boards 3 and 6 – left residents with more questions than answers regarding the long-term impact these pandemic-era health and economic neighborhood solutions have on a post-COVID city. However, the online meetup did bring a wide scope of information in terms of […]

Unused Half of Bowery’s Sunshine Hotel Flophouse Available to Rent

The leasing banner has been strung from the facade of 241 Bowery for more than two years. Without much success. The second and third floors (combined 8,938 square-feet) – once part of the Sunshine Hotel flophouse – are again on the market. And at a hefty price: $6,495 for a “raw” space that requires renovations […]