Why Does CB3 Want to be in Bed with the BID?

Posted on: November 29th, 2018 at 5:00 am by

Lower East Side Partnership logo

It seems rather curious. Why do the top dogs of Community Board 3 want so badly to be in bed with the Lower East Side Partnership?

As previously reported, the SLA subcommittee of Community Board 3 heard a proposal by the Lower East Side Partnership earlier this month that would see the business improvement district become part of the liquor license application process. Needless to say, the appearance on the agenda has since caused confusion amongst board members and angered many residents in the neighborhood already worn down by an over-saturation of bars.

There are three parts to the BID’s proposal – help vet new licensees, assist with the application submission paperwork, and police license stipulations (even though this responsibility falls under the purview of NYPD and SLA).

Locals argue the proposed relationship will stymie democracy and proliferate nightlife even further, while proponents like District Manager Susan Stetzer (also sitting member of Nightlife Advisory Board) and Chair Alysha Coleman are the biggest cheerleaders. Arguing that this arrangement could “streamline” the process and relieve the overburdened SLA subcommittee.

Tim Laughlin of the Lower East Side Partnership

In a bid to assuage the negative sentiment, though, the CB3 Executive Committee revisited the measure last Tuesday, and invited Partnership president Tim Laughlin to return. The public meeting seemed to further galvanize the division amongst the ranks of CB3 and reveal how those at the top are really pushing for this marriage.

Indeed, roughly three hours before the meeting, Susan Stetzer allegedly informed Stuart Zamsky from the 5th Street Block Association that the planned discussion about the BID proposal was canceled. Schedules were cleared. However, the show went on, and Laughlin presented anyway. And again met resistance from within.

During the public meeting, board secretary Clint Smeltzer argued how the whole proposal was poorly prepared and requires additional scrutiny. And how the presentation at committee “was a disaster” and different from what was shown last week.

SLA subcommittee chair Alex Militano echoed that notion and mentioned that the public was left out of the process and that there should be greater transparency. She explained that the huge turnout earlier this month demonstrated that the public is indeed weary and concerned about this proposal, and that nothing currently keeps the BID from supporting “better restaurants” in the neighborhood.

Stetzer held her ground, though, and pushed for the collaboration. Painting the Partnership as selfless saints, while fawning over its history and “benefit” to the community. She even went further, arguing that the BID is a “quasi-governmental agency” and should have a right to participate in the process.

Bargain district signage, Nov. 2010

For context, the Lower East Side Partnership is a nonprofit whose goal is to support landlords within its commercial district. It was founded in 1991 by local real estate baron Sion Misrahi to attract business to the neighborhood using the “bargain district” slogan. A tidal wave of nightlife ensued. Enough to cause legitimate public heath concerns in the present day, according to one Hunter College study.

The BID also maintains a documented track record of supporting liquor licenses within its district, despite community opposition or bad operators (e.g. The DL, 106 Rivington).

As a post-script, later that evening, Zamsky interrupted the meeting after the committee had moved on to other business and mentioned the alleged hoodwink.

“Stetzer tried to parse that she had not told me that there would not be discussion, but that there wouldn’t be an official presentation,” Zamsky said afterward. “I told her and the committee that I was deeply upset and that this was not true. Stetzer then said that it amounted to nothing, since no official action had been taken. She was then chided by the SLA Committee Chair Alex Militano, who said that we were promised by Coleman at the last meeting that we would be able to attend this one to hear the details. We were then bum-rushed out of the room with more profusely apologetic pleas from Coleman.”

So, again, why does CB3 really want to add the Lower East Side Partnership to the process?

Recent Stories

The Year of the Rat Scurries In

It’s the Year of the Rat! This week marks the 21st year of New York City’s Lunar New Year celebration, and no doubt the organizers are scurrying around in preparation for a veritable smorgasbord of festivities. As in years past, the festivities will kick off with the explosive Firecracker Ceremony Saturday morning at 11:00am (January 25) […]

Public Hotel-Adjacent Condo Ascends 4 Stories

The north end of Chrystie Street continues its gilded march toward luxury. Despite the scruffy park at its doorstep. Owner-developer KD Sagamore, which scooped up 199 and 201 Chrystie over the last several years for a combined $20 million, filed for re-development back in December 2017. The plans included merging both parcels into one tax lot, […]

Fat Baby Replacement Evicted Before Ever Opening

The Fat Baby space is again up for grabs. Eviction papers were taped to the door last week, indicating that the latest proposal for the Suave Bar and Restaurant is dead in the water. Suave was the third suitor in the last year for 112 Rivington Street. Principal Erinson Salce (of Sahara East on First […]

Christopher Marte Launches City Council Campaign for 2021

Christopher Marte is jumping back into the City Council election ring. With three-time Councilmember Margaret Chin terming out next year, the local politician is looking to capitalize early on the District 1 seat. Essentially building on the momentum he created during the 2017 election that gave Chin a run for her money. (The incumbent squeaked […]

The Delancey Street ‘Rainbow’ is No More

Discount retailer, Rainbow, is no longer part of the Lower East Side landscape. The longtime store at 110 Delancey Street is now closed up for good. Employees told us back in October that the lease expired, and wasn’t renewed. This particular store had been at 110 Delancey for well over a decade. At one point […]